ABSTRACT
Background: We report the results from the advanced malignant mesothelioma (aMM) expansion cohort of the PEMBIB phase Ib trial (NCT02856425) evaluating the safety, efficacy & biomarkers of an antiangiogenic TKI (nintedanib = [N]) with an anti-PD1 immunotherapy (pembrolizumab = [P]). Methods: Patients (Pts) with aMM that relapsed after at least one line of platinum-based combination were treated with a combination of oral [N] (150mg BID) & IV [P] (200mg Q3W) with 7 days [N] lead-in preceded [P] initiation. Baseline and on-treatment fresh tumor & blood samples were prospectively phenotyped immune cells by flow cytometry (FC). RNAseq was run on tumor samples. Immune factors were titrated by multiplex ELISA on tumor secretome and plasma. Results: 30 aMM Pts were treated and 29 evaluable for response. Median age was 68 years old (38-85) and 86% of aMM were epithelioid. The most frequent adverse events (AE) (grades 1-3) related to the combination were liver enzymes increase, fatigue, nausea and diarrhea. 4 (13.3%) Pts developed grade 3-5 immune- related AE. Patients died of cancer progression (n=14), myocarditis with thrombo-embolic event (n=1) and COVID-19 (n=1). Median follow-up was 14.8 months (95%CI [9.70-18.2]). Best Overall Response Rates (BORR) were Partial Response (PR;n=7), Stable Disease (SD;n=17) and Progressive Disease (PD;n=5). Disease Control Rate (DCR) (defined as PR + SD) was 68.4% and 46.6% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Analyses on fresh tumor biopsies showed that all patients increased their CD3+ T-cells and circulating levels of soluble PD1 and CXCL9 under treatment. Pts developing PR had significantly higher CD45+ and CD3+ tumor infiltrative cells at baseline compared to Pts with SD & PD as BORR. Pts with DCR at 6 months had significantly higher expression of integrins on circulating effector memory CD4+ & CD8+ T cells by FC, and higher NK, T, and myeloid dendritic cells infiltrates on baseline tumor RNAseq. Pre & on-treatment IL6 and IL8 levels in tumor secretome & plasma were higher among Pts with PD. Conclusions: With a BORR of 23% and a DCR of 47% at 6 months, [P]+[N] combination provided valuable therapeutic benefits for Pts with aMM. Flow cytometry and secretome on fresh baseline tumor biopsies are simple techniques which could be used to predict treatment efficacy in aMM Pts. Clinical trial identification: NCT02856425. Legal entity responsible for the study: Gustave Roussy. Funding: Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim;Drug supply: Boehringer Ingelheim & MSD;Sponsor: Gustave Roussy. Disclosure: C. Baldini: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Seattle Genetics;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Iteos;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Tahio;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS. N. Chaput: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: GSK;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Sanofi;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Cytune Pharma. G. Zalcman: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, outside the submitted work: BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, outside the submitted work: MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, outside the submitted work: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, outside the submitted work: Boehringer Ingelheim;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, outside the submitted work: Roche;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, outside the submitted work: Takeda;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, outside the submitted work: AstraZeneca;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, outside the submitted work: AbbVie. C. Massard: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amgen;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Bayer;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BeiGene;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Celgene;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Debiopharm Group;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Ipsen;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Janssen;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Lilly;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: MSD;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Novartis;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Pfizer;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Sanofi;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Orion;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Taiho Pharmaceuticals;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Blueprint Medicinces;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Innate Pharma;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: PharmaMar;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Faron Pharmaceuticals. J-C. Soria: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Gritstone Oncology;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Relay Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Hookipa Pharmaceuticals;Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, sept 2017 to dec 2019: AstraZeneca. A. Marabelle: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche/Genentech;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck Serono;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Servier;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Roche/Genentech;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: MSD;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Pfizer;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Lytix Pharma;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Eisai;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Tesaro;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Chugai;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Ose Immunotherapeutics;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Sotio;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Molecular Partners;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: IMCheck;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Pierre Fabre;Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: Adlai Nortye;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Pegascy SAS;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Centessa Pharmaceuticals;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: HiFiBio;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Shattuck Labs;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Merus;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Transgene;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Fondation MSD Avenir;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Background: Outcomes and risk factors associated with COVID-19 worsening among cancer patients have previously been reported. However, the actual impact of SARs-Co-V2 infection on the cancer treatment strategy remains unknown. Here, we report the Gustave Roussy (GR) experience, one year after the onset of the pandemic focusing on the impact of COVID-19 in patients with ongoing management of oncohematological disease. Methods: All patients positively tested for SARS-CoV-2 and managed at GR between Mar 14th 2020 and Feb 15th 2021 (data cut-off) have been included. Patients underlying oncohematological disease and COVID19 characteristics have been collected. Cancer and COVID-19 management and outcomes have been assessed. Primary endpoint was the overall impact of COVID-19 on oncological and hematological treatment strategy assessed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Results: At the time of the analysis, 423 patients (median age: 62 years) were found positive for SARS-CoV-2 and managed at GR with a median follow up of 5.6 months (0-13 months). Among them, 284 (67%) were admitted due to COVID-19. Clinical deterioration occurred in 87 patients (21%), 43 patients (10%) were transferred in intensive care unit and 123 (29%) patients died, among which 47 (11%) died from COVID-19. Overall, 329 (78%) patients were on active treatment for underlying oncohematological disease at time of COVID diagnosis. Impact of COVID-19 on cancer treatment strategy in those patients is presented in the Table. The majority (N=268, 81%) had no change in oncological strategy. For those who experienced a delay, median delay in treatment was 21 days (N=99, [1-77]), 30 days (N=15, [15-56]), 7 days (N=8,[3-35]) for systemic treatment, surgery and radiotherapy respectively. [Formula presented] Conclusions: COVID-19 outbreak is associated with a significant mortality in patients with cancer. However, for patients who did not die from COVID-19, we provide the first report supporting that ongoing treatment was maintained or could be resumed in the majority of cases in a timely manner. Legal entity responsible for the study: Gustave Roussy. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic deeply threatens the rigorous conduct of clinical trials, notably by delaying site initiation visits, patient enrolment, treatment administration, trial-associated procedures, and data monitoring. Unlike most other medical specialties, clinical trials are an integral part of patient care in oncology. Limiting access to clinical trials therefore results in a loss of chance for patients. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we collected clinical trial-specific items (including patient-related or trial management-related items) during the first pandemic wave (March– June 2020) and lockdown (March 17th-May 11th) at Gustave Roussy, and compared them to those of the same period in 2019. Results: In March 2020, 84 phase I (P1) and 210 phase II/III (P2/3) trials were open. During the first pandemic wave, 21 (25%) P1 and 20 (9%) P2/3 trials were temporarily halted, following a unilateral sponsor decision in virtually all cases;all but one were industry-sponsored. Despite this, all important metrics of the P1/2 trial activity remained similar to those of 2019, including the number of patients referred for inclusion (599 vs 620), inclusion consultations (215 vs 247), patients starting treatment (130 vs 130), Internal Review Board (IRB) submissions (14 vs 16), and site initiation visits (11 vs 15), all in 2020 vs 2019, respectively. The impact of the first lock-down was more marked on P2/3, with 152 patient inclusions (vs 346 in 2019), 125 randomizations (vs 278), 43 IRB submissions (vs 50) and 34 site initiation visits (vs 40). However, in parallel, 475 patients were included in three “COVID and cancer” trials. Among the 443 P1 and 2851 P2/3 patients, 198 and 628 COVID-19 PCR were performed internally, and five and 15 (2.5%) were positive, respectively. One patient with a community-based COVID-19 died after transfer in intensive care. Conclusions: Cancer clinical trials can, and must be maintained despite challenges brought by COVID-19. Sharing experiences and retrospectively evaluating the impact on patients’ safety and cancer-related outcomes will be critical to durably improve the clinical trials conduct and to anticipate at best challenges brought by future similar crises. Legal entity responsible for the study: Gustave Roussy. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Neoplasms , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hospitalization , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Viremia/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The impact of the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave on cancer patient management was measured within the nationwide network of the Unicancer comprehensive cancer centers in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The number of patients diagnosed and treated within 17 of the 18 Unicancer centers was collected in 2020 and compared with that during the same periods between 2016 and 2019. Unicancer centers treat close to 20% of cancer patients in France yearly. The reduction in the number of patients attending the Unicancer centers was analyzed per regions and cancer types. The impact of delayed care on cancer-related deaths was calculated based on different hypotheses. RESULTS: A 6.8% decrease in patients managed within Unicancer in the first 7 months of 2020 versus 2019 was observed. This reduction reached 21% during April and May, and was not compensated in June and July, nor later until November 2020. This reduction was observed only for newly diagnosed patients, while the clinical activity for previously diagnosed patients increased by 4% similar to previous years. The reduction was more pronounced in women, in breast and prostate cancers, and for patients without metastasis. Using an estimated hazard ratio of 1.06 per month of delay in diagnosis and treatment of new patients, we calculated that the delays observed in the 5-month period from March to July 2020 may result in an excess mortality due to cancer of 1000-6000 patients in coming years. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the delays in cancer patient management were observed only for newly diagnosed patients, more frequently in women, for breast cancer, prostate cancer, and nonmetastatic cancers. These delays may result is an excess risk of cancer-related deaths in the coming years.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms/complications , COVID-19/complications , Female , France , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Paris's region significantly affected Gustave Roussy Cancer Center.Previous analyses showed that mortality rate increases with age in the general population. Here, we report theGustave Roussy experience on older patients (OP) with cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Methods: Cancer pts with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection were admitted at Gustave Roussy starting March 12th.Screening indications have been adapted over the time. All the COVID19 pts positively tested and managed atGustave Roussy between March 14th (1st positive case) and April 15th have been included in a REDCap database.Pts and underlying oncologic and COVID19 diseases characteristics have been collected. Cancer and COVID-19managements and outcomes have been assessed. The primary endpoint of this analysis was the clinicaldeterioration, defined as the need for O2 supplementation of 6l/min, or death of any cause. Results: Among the first 137 cancer pts diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2, 36 patients were aged 70 years (26%). Mostof them were female (61%) with a median age of 75.5 years old. Most frequent underlying cancers were solidtumors (92%) including GI (19%), lung (17%), GYN (14%), and head and neck (14%). Most OP (36%) were ECOGperformance status 2 versus 24% in younger patients (YP). The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was made byRT-PCR or thoracic CT scan alone in 97% and 3% of the cases, respectively, in OP and in 92% and 8% in YP. MostOP experienced symptoms prior to testing (92%) compared to YP (80%). Symptoms differed according to age withmore cough with sputum production in OP (14% versus 5%), dyspnea (39% versus 31%), diarrhea (17% versus9%), shivers (8% versus 0%), sore throat (8% versus 4%), and no anosmia or agueusia. The majority of OP werehospitalized (81%) compared to 72% of YP and treated with HCQ/AZI (15;52%) with inclusion in the ONCOVID trial(EudraCT: 2020-01250-21) compared to 25 (35%) YP. They did not receive any IL-6 inhibitor. Only one OP wasadmitted in the ICU (3%). Clinical deterioration occurred in 10 OP (29%). There was no impact of age on clinicalworsening (HR=1.157;95%CI 0.55-2.42;p=0.7). However, age was associated with worse overall survival (OS)(HR=2.45 95%CI 1.02-5.92 ;p=0.0463). Results will be updated at the meeting. Conclusions: OP with cancer had a different disease presentation, same rate of clinical worsening, but worse OSin SARS-CoV-2 infection.
ABSTRACT
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak significantly affected Gustave Roussy cancer center. Here, we report the Gustave Roussy experience on older patients (OP) with cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Methods: Cancer pts with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection were admitted at Gustave Roussy starting March, 12th. Screening indications have been adapted over time. All the COVID-19 pts positively tested and managed at Gustave Roussy between March 14th and April 15th have been included in a redcap database. Pts and underlying oncological and COVID-19 diseases characteristics have been collected. Cancer and COVID-19 managements, and outcomes have been assessed. The primary endpoint of this analysis was the clinical deterioration, defined as the need for O2 supplementation of 6l/min or more, or death of any cause. Results: Among the first 137 cancer pts diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2, 36 patients were aged 70 years old or over (26%). Most of them were female (61%) with a median age of 75.5 years old. Most frequent underlying cancers were solid tumors (92%) including GI (19%), lung (17%), GYN (14%) and head and neck (14%). Most OP (36%) were ECOG Performans status 2 versus 24% in younger patients (YP). The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was made by RT-PCR or thoracic CT scan alone in 97% and 3% of the cases, respectively in OP and in 92% and 8% in YP. Most OP experienced symptoms prior to testing (92%) compared to YP (80%). Symptoms differed according to age with more cough with sputum production in OP (14% versus 5%), dyspnea (39% versus 31%), diarrhea (17% versus 9%), shivers (8% versus 0%), sore throat (8% versus 4%) and no anosmia nor agueusia. The majority of OP was hospitalized (81%) compared to 72% of YP and treated with HCQ/AZI (15;52%) compared to 25 (35%) YP with inclusion in the ONCOVID trial (EudraCT: 2020-01250-21). They did not receive any IL-6 inhibitor. Only one OP was admitted in the ICU (3%). Clinical deterioration occurred in 10 OP (29%). There was no impact of age on clinical worsening (HR=1.157;95%CI 0.55-2.42;p=0.7). However age was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR=2.45 95%CI 1.02-5.92;p=0.0463). Results will be updated at the meeting. Conclusions: OP with cancer had a different disease presentation, same rate of clinical worsening but worse OS in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.